Comment

Alex Onate from MINNOW talks "Waves Goodbye"

 

From time to time we come across an LA band we really dig whose record we didn't release.  Earlier this year a band called MINNOW put out a stellar EP called Exploded View of Home.  At first blush, Home is a straight-forward guitar record, but a closer listen unlocks a chilly cinematic world of complex arrangements, sparkling keys and head-bobbing rhythms.  Our favorite track is called "Waves Goodbye."  Recently, we chatted with Alex Onate, drum player in MINNOW, about the band in general and this track specifically.

You can catch MINNOW live tonight at the Bootleg with Toothless.

 

 

CL:  Alex, I like how we met, reaching out and going to a show.  It spoke to the way you operate.  Super community based.  That's fucking cool.  Give us a brief history on yourself and how you got involved with MINNOW.

ALEX:  Thanks, Ben. Yeah, one of my favorite parts about being involved with music is the community. It's really cool to think about the amount of longtime friends I've made over the years just from playing in bands and becoming immersed with all the amazing artists around me.  I was born and raised in Los Angeles, started playing drums around age 6 and really just haven't stopped. Joining punk/hardcore bands is where I really found my place and that lead to a fair amount of touring and studio experience at a pretty early age. As for Minnow, the idea for the band began in 2011 with myself and the two guitar players Madison and Kenny, just a bunch parts that we had all individually been sitting on for a while that eventually became our first batch of songs. In 2012, with a full line up and a name, we released our first self titled EP and played our first few shows. I guess that made things official.

CL:  Ah, makes sense that's how the songs came about.  There's a real sense of dynamics based on the rhythm and drum parts.  That's true about my favorite track on the new record "Waves Goodbye,"  What can you tell me about that jam?  Where'd you guys record it?

ALEX:  "Waves Goodbye" is probably my favorite song on the new record as well. The idea for that one came from our guitar player, Madison.  When we started the writing cycle for this EP he sent us a few ideas he had been demoing and this was one of the first songs we put together. I'm really stoked on how it came out. 

The recording for Exploded View of Home was done between two studios. We did all the drums first with my good friend, Roger Camero, at Bright Mountain Studios and everything else was recorded and mixed by Kenny Tye, who plays guitar in MINNOW. He works for a music publishing company that has a really nice studio that Kenny actually redesigned and brought back to life. This was the first time that we had the opportunity to actually take our time in the studio and sit on ideas for a bit before committing.  We'd spend most evenings and weekend mornings in there just tracking a bunch of ideas. The mastering was done by our friend Jack Shirley who also engineered and mastered our first full length Trembles & Temperance.

Exploded View of Home is available anywhere you stream music.

 

Comment

Comment

Charter Amendment C Examined

Who likes cops? 

Not me. As a rational citizen who is concerned with safety and social order, I've accepted the need for them.  But I can't say I've had many positive experiences with police officers.  The way I see it, my tax dollars fund an institution made up of individuals who carry deadly weapons and are looking for ways to jam me up.  The particular Los Angeles version of this institution is especially problematic, sporting a long history of brutality and racism.  It's so fucked up that I question the very moral fiber of a person who decides to be a cop in LA.  While I'm sure many are good-intentioned civil servants, the system in which they participate actively nullifies their best qualities.  Just like our political system, no matter how good you try to be, you play in the dirt, you get dirty.

I bring this up only to be clear about my inherent biases towards the LAPD, seeing as Charter Amendment C concerns civilian review of police conduct.  As it stands now, when a cop fucks up, the case is sent before a Board of Rights panel.  This panel has the final authority to determine guilt and prescribe a penalty in all misconduct cases brought before it.  As of now, this panel is made up of two police officers with the rank of Captain or higher and one civilian member.  (Before 1992, there were no civilians on the Board of Rights.) If the amendment passes, an officer can choose between this current option OR a new option: an all civilian review board.

The measure has been submitted by the Mayor and the Los Angeles Protective League as a way to increase police accountability.  But organizations such as the ACLU and Black Lives Matter have been calling bullshit on this, and for good reason.  The first thing that stinks about C is that the amendment provides an ordinance for who these civilian review board members will be, but prior to the election, this ordinance has yet to be drafted.  Basically, if we agree to this change, we're trusting the LA City Council, in its infinite apolitical wisdom, not to stack the pool with ex-cops and departmental cronies. 

Secondly, this measure is supported by the police union.  I've never known a union to support a measure that doesn't favor its members, so right there, we have a problem.  More accountability and oversight is in fundamental opposition to bad cops keeping their jobs. Imagine the teachers' union agreeing to a panel of parents deciding which teachers get to continue teaching every year.  I can't see that happening.

What's further problematic about this measure is the timing.  I'll quote an LA Times editorial here, because they said it better than I ever could: "The sneakiest part of the measure is the May 16 ballot itself. There are runoffs in two council districts, but otherwise Charter Amendment C is the only thing on the ballot, so few voters — other than those rallied by the Police Protective League and city politicians that crave the union’s support — are expected to bother. Voters can, and should, resist that cynical tactic and the ill-considered change in police discipline by voting 'No.'"

I've also read articles circulated by various activist groups noting the evidence suggests that civilian members of the Board of Rights have been more lenient on cops than police officers themselves.  And since we don't yet know exactly who will make up the pool from which the Board of Rights members will be chosen--some suggest it will be ex-arbitrators and lawyers, not community members--I don't see how in good conscience anyone committed to reforming an institution with deep systemic problems, problems which threaten the very lives and well-being of the communities they are sworn to protect, can vote in favor of this.

Comment

Comment

"Donatella Versace" Video Premier + Eli Chartkoff: The Chain Letter Interview

Eli Chartkoff, one half of hibernating duo The Monolators, returns with the new solo record Obliteration City on April 28th.  Based on interviews with various people, some famous, some not, the record is ultimately a verisimilar meditation on the human condition.   At the risk of being hyper-meta, I interviewed Eli about the process behind Obliteration City and being a mainstay of the Los Angeles scene for the last 15 years.  Enjoy the video for "Donatella Versace" and check out Eli Chartkoff live April 26th at the Hi Hat.  The show is co-presented by Defend LA and benefits the Trevor Project, a non-profit dedicated to assisting at-risk trans teens.  

CL: Obliteration City is a concept record in the truest sense of the term.  Explain the concept and the evolution behind it.

Eli: Sometimes I think the whole idea of a 'concept album' is kind of hokey, but I guess this is one, all right.  All of the lyrics for all of the songs on Obliteration City were adapted from interviews with various people, some famous, some not.  Some of the interviews came from magazines, some came from books, some were TV interviews I found on YouTube, some came from documentaries, but they're all real things that real people said. 

This idea, like so many other good ideas these days, originally came from Gwyneth Paltrow.  I was on Facebook one day and someone posted a link to an article called "The 20 Most Obnoxious Gwyneth Paltrow Food Quotes," which I had to read.  One of the quotes was from a Red Book interview where she was asked what she'd want for her last meal.   She said: "oysters, cocktail sauce and then a baked and stuffed lobster," things like that, and then she added: "I drank like crazy when the kids were babies.  How else could I get through my day?"  That sounded like a song to me, so I set it to music, word for word.  Thanks Gwyneth!

Also, at my job (I work in the archives of a college library) I was working then on a project to digitize a big collection of 1950's and 60's tape recordings of choral music, pieces by Brahms, Bach, etc. etc.  While I listened to these tapes it occurred to me that none of the composers I was listening to had actually written the lyrics to their songs.  They'd taken lines from the Bible, or poems, and set them to music.  So while (say) Franz Schubert wrote the music for "Ave Maria," the text came from an older poem.  

I decided that if they could write songs with words taken from poems, then why not write more songs with lyrics taken from interviews?  So that idea evolved pretty quickly.  Finding more interviews that would work and actually recording the songs is what took me so long, almost two years.

CL: The stories of these people are at times heartbreaking, but you always treat them with the utmost empathy.  Did you find yourself relating to these people when working on the songs?

Eli: I have to admit that I wasn't thinking about empathy at all in the beginning.  The first couple of songs were adapted from interviews in Vogue and Bazaar Magazine with famous fashion/celebrity types, like Gwyneth and Donatella Versace, people who are maybe a little eccentric and removed from reality.  They'd say outrageous, crazy things that only make sense to other famous fashion/celebrity types, it was easy to make fun of them, and the songs were easy to write.  But even with the Gwyneth song, when she said "I drank like crazy when the kids were babies," yes, I can relate to that.  Anyone who has kids can relate to that!  So there was still a tiny bit of truth amidst the delusion.

Later on I decided to start using non-celebrity interviews with people who weren't super successful or powerful, and a lot of those were on the grim side.  There were a lot of themes that would pop up, loneliness, regrets, fears about being broke, all things that I had tried to write about myself in the past but couldn't really pull off.  I feel like the people in those interviews were able to say things that I had wanted to say for a long time but couldn't figure out how to do it.  So yes, I definitely relate, and it was also a "I wish I had thought of that" kinda deal.

CL: You are one of the most prolific artists I know, but this your first true "solo" record.  How was the experience for you, as someone so accustomed to working in a band environment?

Eli: Actually I've done a bunch of solo records over the years, it's just that I either never released them publicly, or I just threw them up on my Bandcamp page and didn't really tell anyone.  In the past I'd go and make a little "solo" record on my own if I needed to write a bunch of new songs in a hurry, and then any of those songs would be up for grabs for whatever band I played in.  There's an old solo record that has early versions of about half the songs that ended up on Our Tears Have Wings by The Monolators, for instance.  Obliteration City is the same thing, some of the songs have already been re-made by two of the bands I play in.  This is the first time that one my solo records has come out on a label, though, and the first time that I've put as much effort into the production on a solo record as I would on a "band" record.

CL: What active projects are you currently involved in?  

Eli: I'm in two active bands now with my wife Mary.  One is Dawn of Sequins, which evolved out of our old band, Monolators, except it's just the two of us instead of a full band.   We use drum machines and backing tracks, and Mary plays saxophone and sings and writes more of the songs than before.  We put out an album in 2013 on the Vanity Projects label and are almost done recording the follow-up.  I'm not sure what it will be called, but it will be out in 2017, and on that album there will be Dawn of Sequins versions of a couple of the songs from Obliteration City.

The second band is called Madame Headdress, which is a sax/flute/tap dancing/choral singing group.  We used to have a band called Cobra Lilies, which was sort of folk-y, there were 12-13 members, and along with singing and playing we'd do elaborate dancing and roller skating routines.  When that band broke up some of the Lilies reformed as Madame Headdress.  We're finishing up an album for Madame Headdress that should also come out in 2017 on the Mental Illness Recordings label.  I think it's currently called Vouvray, named for our favorite kind of wine to drink at rehearsal. It's got sax/flute/tap dancing versions of the Donatella and Gwyneth songs from Obliteration City.  MH also recently made an all-piñata video for an anti-Trump song called "Cats Against Trump" that came out pretty well.  

Mary and I also do what we call "Mini-Bands," which are temporary bands we form with friends to write and record records.  Then we play a single show and break up.  We have lots of people we'd like to play music with, but nobody we know has time to commit to more bands than the ones they're already in, including ourselves, so this is a way to do something that is low on the commitment scale.  We've done two of these records in the past year or so and have plans for more, including with [cough cough] some of the Chain Letter Collective staff, I believe?

Finally, I also play in my friend Tom's band, Shirley Rolls, and there's a new record in progress for the Rolls, as well.

CL:  When you write, do you write for a specific project?

Eli:  Sometimes.  Especially for the mini-bands, Mary and I might say "we need to write a couple of songs for X band," and then we'll try to come up with something that sounds like it will fit.  Mostly I'll just write something that interests me and then we try to find a home for it. 

CL:  Let's briefly revisit the past.  You and Mary were an integral part of creating the scene that so many big East Side bands came out of, Henry Clay People and Airborne Toxic Event to name a couple.  Were you aware of this at the time?  Do you think back to 2001 when Monolators was just getting started and recall wanting to start some sort of scene?

Eli: In the beginning I don't think we had any plan other than trying to find places to play.  When we started in 2002 we played absolutely anywhere we possibly could, all over Los Angeles, mostly at places that are long gone now, and I look back at a lot of those shows and think "what were we thinking???"  It was kind of chaotic.   Sometimes we'd meet bands that we liked, and yes, we'd make friends with them and go to each others' shows.  Later on, when we started being able to book shows at Mr. T's Bowl and Pehrspace, we did consciously try to give shows to other bands that were having a hard time finding places to play, but I think that was the extent of our influence on the East Side scene.  We were just trying to help our friends out and play whenever we could. 

 

CL:  I'm fascinated by the idea of lost bands; the idea that some amazing thing existed for a short time that very few people got to experience.  Having played hundreds of shows, can you name a band or two that may qualify as such?

Eli:  Apart from a couple of people who ended up signing to bigger labels or getting national attention, I think that almost all of our friends' bands count as lost.  Venues in Los Angeles are ephemeral, so are the bands.   Even the 'next big thing' bands that I thought for sure were going to make it nationally are mostly forgotten...at least we've got a stash of everybody's homemade cd-r's at home, because otherwise they didn't seem to leave much of a trace.  So I think the answer is "too many to list."

CL:  You've been in the local music game for as long as anyone I know.  What's changed since you started?  And where do you see it going?

Eli:  The biggest change in LA I've seen in the last few years is the drastic rise in rents and the cost of living. It's driving away venues and musicians, DIY all-ages/experimental venues especially.  Everybody's worried that there's going to be a crackdown on venues following the Ghost Ship tragedy, people are leaving the city because it's not affordable any more.  It's a struggle to find places to play, now more than ever.  Maybe Los Angeles will just stop being a place to be in a band?  I hope not.

CL:  Is there any hope?  I mean, in general, about the world we live in now.  

Eli:  I re-wrote my answer to this four or five times because everything I said sounded either flippant or like a slogan off an inspirational "you can do it" poster.  I'm not sure that I have anything useful or insightful to say, I wish I did.  Mary and I talk about politics and the future endlessly.  Things look bad right now, it's overwhelming, but I do hope that the sheer awfulness of the (Trump) administration will galvanize more people into fighting back, demanding changes.  People can start by getting involved in their local elections.  I think that's possible, so there's that kind of hope.

OK, here's my inspirational poster moment: I think about the Gia Carangi interview, the last song on the record, where she says: "I'm gonna show you motherfuckers what I can do.  I'm still in shape, everybody, I'm still alive."  That's my motto now. I'm gonna put that on a poster with a picture of a tiger or a crab or something.  A tiger fighting a crab.

CL:  What was the last thing that inspired you? It can be anything.

Eli:  My family does sing-alongs when we get together for the holidays.  We do folk songs, Christmas songs, Beatles songs, stuff like that.  In a sing-a-long there's not much call for guitar riffage or extended sax solos (much as I love both), it's just drinking raspberry liqueur and belting out songs like "They're Moving Father's Grave To Build A Sewer."  Not every song works as a sing-along.  The tune & lyrics have to hold up on their own with zero embellishments, and it's not easy to write that way.  That's what I aspire to, and doing the sing-along reminded me of that.

Oh, also: we were listening to a record by the Carter Sisters the other day and they had a song that went something like "I ain't leaving without my bay-beeee."  But Mary thought it went "I ain't leaving without my bike," which is better. So now I think I need to write a song about my bike.

April, 2017

 

Comment

Comment

PREMIERE: Wolf Woodcock's "Pet"

Wolf Woodcock “Pet”

 

I’m not exactly certain when or where I met Wolf, or if he was wearing pants.  The bassist for LA’s psycho-sexual kings Vs Colour, Wolf is a man of intense talent, at turns a composer, multi-instrumentalist, and vocalist.  “Pet” is his first release under his own name, but what immediately strikes me is how composed, how confident, the music is.  

 

Wolf had this to say about “Pet”:

"Pet is a song about the feelings someone can get when he believes that he is a subordinate in a relationship and conversely when the roles are reversed and his significant other feels unequal. These thoughts sometimes only come when he or she has distanced themselves from the relationship for a long time. It’s important to feel equal and to make sure that both parties have confidence in themselves as humans and as partners. This song explores both sides of the feelings and how reflection can prove to be helpful in moving forward in future relationships and friendships."

 

We look forward to many more releases to come!

 

 

Comment

Comment

OPINION: M OR N? WE VOTE 3/7/17

M or N?

 

No, you’re not high.  There are two competing measures regarding marijuana regulation on LA’s March 7th ballot.  Right off the bat, let’s separate the two measures.  Measure M is sponsored by Mayor Garcetti and the LA City Council. Measure N is a citizen initiative.  However, since Measure M was introduced, supporters of Measure N have abandoned their measure and have urged peeps to vote in favor of M.  Got that?  No one likes N.  Not even the ones that used to like N, like N.  

 

While essentially clerical in nature—legalizing recreational marijuana in California antiquated our old regulatory measures from 2013—Measure M represents a larger political argument.  The nuts and bolts of M give the City regulatory powers over the sale and distribution of marijuana.  It also decreases the tax on medical pot from 6% to 5%, while levying a 10% tax on recreational pot, and a 1-2% tax on the transportation, cultivation, and research-related areas of marijuana.

 

The larger question is whether or not you’re for government regulation.  Voting No on M (I’m just gonna ignore N from here on out) means you’re for the deregulation of marijuana.  Imagine a free-for-all wild-west situation where anything goes.  Remember when you could vape anywhere?  Pre-school playgrounds, movie theaters, restaurants, funeral homes?  Voting No on Measure M wouldn’t give you that same freedom with weed, but you would be essentially saying, “fuck city government.”  Which, hell yeah, fuck the man, right?

 

Not so fast.  As a student of entropy and chaos, I used to be a flippant proponent of nihilism.  That was until I witnessed nihilism in action.  For your consideration, I present the presidency of one Donald J. Trump.  His efforts to render language meaningless and fact subjective, his encouragement of the capitalistic greed of multi-national corporations via deregulation, plus his sheer unpredictability (anyone who can single-handedly annihilate the human race via nuclear Armageddon, I’d prefer to be a bit more predictable) should give anyone with half a fucking thought for their future the heebee-jeebies.  Do I trust governments?  Fuck no.  They’re made up of people and people are irrational and selfish.  However, there are cases where I have to choose between the devil I know, i.e. the Mayor and City Council, who have some sense of accountability and track record, and the devil I don’t, nihilism--by it’s very definition--and it’s effect if loosed on Los Angeles.

 

Perhaps I’m being hyperbolic.   Measure M is just red tape through which we have to sort.  There isn’t even an official argument registered against Measure M.  Voting Yes should be a no-brainer.  But stranger things have happened when people throw up their hands and say “fuck it, let’s watch it all burn.”

 

 

Comment